Spark Arresters and Coolers

Important Factors in Spark Arrester Selection
(1) Pressure drop across QUENCHER style of unit is a function of the Reynolds number which is proportional to the density for air. This means that a unit can be sized smaller if operating at a higher temperature. For instance a suppressor operating at 440 degrees F is 2/3 the size of the typical unit applied at 70 degrees F and the pressure drop will be designed the same. This lowers the cost of the suppressor. The density is also affected by the water vapor in the gas stream. It has little effect at temperatures below 125 degrees F but can be a major factor when operating at higher temperatures.
(2) If the gas steam has dust that might drop out in the duct at the velocities in the blender style or QUENCHER suppressor, a booster must be provided to periodically remove this accumulation. If this unit is not kept clean it might pose a threat by putting an extra load on the duct-work. Without an Automatic Booster System, the suppressor might require periodic manual cleaning.
(3) The booster design is also temperature sensitive and must be altered to accommodate changing gas steam conditions. Most suppliers do not have the capability to modify these booster designs.

There are several approaches to the issue of extinguishing sparks in a gas stream.

Cyclone Dust Collectors
Contrary to common belief Cyclones are not an effective spark arrestor. For a spark arrestor/cooler to work, there must be turbulence to be effective. If you have turbulence in a cyclone pressure drop is very high. They are designed to avoid turbulence. Many bag house fires occur in systems with cyclone pre-cleaners. Amazingly the inlet baffles on the bag-house are more effective as spark arrestors, however they are not foolproof.

Static Baffle-Box Spark Arrestor
Many dust collector suppliers offer this type. It consists of air entering at one end of a baffle box running over a baffle plate which drops out the sparks and much of the dust collected. The air exits at the other end, and then travels to the dust collector. The big drawback is that a hopper and flexible or solid hose connection to a collection barrel is required. Also, these devices do not eliminate all of the sparks. There is not enough turbulence generated to ensure hundred percent spark arrestance. Sparks may ignite the contents of the collection bin

Mesh Filters
This is a common stop-gap measure where the filter is placed at the exhaust duct of hoods or installed in the duct-work. When clean, the mesh filter will stop at best 80% of sparks. These filters do not produce enough pressure drop to be fully effective. It only takes one spark to ignite dust in the duct or set a dust collector on fire. The only thing these filters do is clog up and add to your maintenance.

Blender Type Air Mixers
A number of these air blender/mixers have been applied successfully as spark coolers and suppressors. Over the last 5-6 years standard air mixers have been adapted and applied between the spark generating process and dust collector. They were applied in processes where fires in the dust collectors had previously occurred. One supplier hired a consultant to develop a market for these air blender/mixers as a spark arrestor/cooler. This blender design was an outgrowth of mixing two gas streams of different temperatures to insure a uniform temperature after the static mixer. It was deduced that the gas stream produced turbulent flow as it passed through the blades and this was the reason it could be adapted to spark cooling. However, these are air mixers first and spark arrestors second. There are performance limitations because not enough turbulence is imparted to the spark ember.

Improved Spark Arrestors
QAM developed the QUENCHER, which is a variation of the blender/mixer design. Employing a 60 year old spin vane mist eliminator technology developed by Sly Manufacturing in the early 1960’s, led QAM to vary the blade designs to have the most effective performance, inducing maximum turbulence to the gas stream, and lowering the cost. Maximum turbulence is the key to spark arrestance. After several tests it was found that the air blender/mixer design did not impart enough turbulence and some sparks got through, especially at low gas stream velocities. Eventually, there was a specific design which imparted the most effective swirling and turbulence thereby extinguishing the sparks quickly and most effectively. In fact, during testing of the QUENCHER, the arrestor cell would light up as a ball of fire, however, one inch past the cell nothing was left in the gas stream. These designs were incorporated into the QUENCHER. QAM has developed special application data in which the blade angles are adjusted to produce minimum pressure drop for different temperatures and gas densities. To our knowledge, no one else accounts for the gas density effects on spark arrestors. In truth, due to the advanced design, even applying the incorrect parameters to a QUENCHER may not result in a failure to put out sparks. Since the pressure drop across the blender and mixer are a function of the velocity through the device, the development of a pneumatically operated booster was introduced to prevent dust dropout accumulating in the static blender/mixer. It also blows out accumulations on the blades.
Read more: Quencher Spark Arrestor


Liquid Spray Systems.
For many years these systems were the only available systems to prevent fires caused by sparks. The system consists of electronic detectors that detect sparks and react to their presence. When a spark is detected liquid sprays are actuated and water sprayed into the duct. The sprays actually cool the gas stream below the dew point. However, in dust collection systems, the water then wets the filter bags or cartridges. This prevents fires but the gas flow is interrupted and the bags must be either replaced or dried out before the process can resume. The detector sensitivity can be lowered to prevent excessive actuations, but, this reduces the reliability of the systems. The detector missing a spark is an ever present danger and a fire may occur. Bag or cartridge replacement is definitely required.

Static Blade Spark Suppressor (Tri Pass)
These were developed in Japan to replace multiple cyclones in Coal fired boilers. They found that the multiple cyclones did not stop sparks from entering the dust collectors. The first ones were installed in the early 70’s. They ran at 1.5 inches of pressure drop and were fabricated from structure angles to resist the wear of the abrasive ashes in the coal that they fired. There are several of these applications installed in the USA designed by one of our colleagues.

We trust that the above information will enable you to evaluate and select the most suitable method and supplier for your application. Buying our QUENCHER/BOOSTER combination will give you a risk free unit, fine tuned for each application. 

More on... Dust Collection and Spark Arrestors

Spark Arresters Prevent Fires

Transport of sparks through ducts; Referring to the sketch below, there is a glowing ember (red particle) surrounded by some hot air (yellow envelop)) which gives the spark buoyancy. This spark (at approx 1400degF) and the hot gas (at approx 800degF) associated with it can travel hundreds of feet in a duct. The ductwork is designed to give laminar (smooth ) flow. This is illustrated on the left of the QUENCHER spark arrestor. Spark suppressors are placed in the duct to change the flow to turbulent (coarse) flow, as shown on the right of the QUENCHER spark arrestor. This agitation or turbulence strips the air from around the ember thereby removing the fuel (oxygen) and breaking up the envelop of hot air, therefore extinguishing and cooling the spark below ignition temperature (pink particle).
Prevention depends on eliminating the causes of ignition. Spark traps can change laminar to turbulent flow and extinguish any sparks in a duct. Design duct systems for dust transport velocities. Install a pneumatic actuated duct booster to flush dust into the dust collector. Use air jets to remove electrostatic charges on duct surfaces. 
Read more about... QUENCHER Spark Arrestors
Read more about... Booster - Duct Cleaner

View a video on the QUENCHER

Furnace and Dust Collector Fire Hazards

Fires in brass furnaces have always been a danger.

First let us review the process; as the material is fed into the furnace it has many metals including zinc, tin etc. Some of these actually go to vapor and then condense and turn into solids.

The key is that these metals are very fine with very large area to weight ratios. The exhaust is generally cooled by mixing with ambient air so the metals are not appreciably oxidized. The dusts collect, with the other dusts, in the dust filter cake.

When the collector is shut down the metals start to oxidize and the effect is like catalytic combustion. The oxidation produces heat. The dust is usually a good heat insulator and "hot spots" occur. Sometimes the temperature is high enough to start a fire when the flow was stopped. More often, when the collector is turned on, the initial flow fans the sparks and when conditions are optimum for combustion, a fire will start. Most of the time small holes or scorching can be noticed on the bags before a fire.

Sparks may occur as scrap is added to the molten metal. This is common when the scrap is oily.  The usual time to add scrap into the furnace is at the end of the shift when the collector is especially vulnerable to fires.

The approach to prevent fires is to extinguish sparks if they are present and to cool the hot spots when air is not flowing through the system.

To extinguish sparks the flow before the collector must be changed from laminar to turbulent flow. This is accomplished by installing a QUENCHER spark arrestor in the air conduit to the dust collector.

To keep the "hot spots" cool, my suggestion is to pulse the collector off line every thirty minutes or so for one complete cycle to cool the "hot spots". If the off-line cleaning is too frequent, the cake will be destroyed or damaged, so, the cleaning must be controlled.

When selecting a fabric pulse jet collector, high-ratio technology designs can operate at filter ratios of 16:1.  Cartridge collectors are not a good selection as the pleats may promote formation of the hotspots described above.

We first used this technique at St Joe Mineral, which was near Pittsburgh, 30 years ago, on their zinc oxide furnaces. We were informed that they were venting through an AAF pulse jet collectors. AAF has managed to put out some of the worst pulse jet collector designs in the Industry. From the description it sounds like a AAF FabriPulse. That collector if it is top access design has these venturies that wedge in the top of the bag. Using the American vernacular, it sucks. The purpose of the venturi is to seal the top of the bag with the cleaning jet. There are openings around the top of the bag below the wide part of the venturi. This, in effect, allows the jet to grow until the growth is stopped by the walls of the bag. That is an over simplification of the process, but it is a fact that it sucks. The net result is that the collector cleans poorly and there is a lot of dust that is forced into the surface and subsurface filter cake.

On any kind of brass furnace it is best to keep the dust cake porous and thin. As I explained previously, in a brass and other process, the zinc goes from vapor to liquid to solid and forms zinc fume. This zinc fume because of its large surface area to weight ratio can burn or explode quite easily.

We were involved in a legal action where the customer hired a man to change bags on a MikroPul collector venting a zinc dipping operation where they were coating pipes. The young man, after he was half finished (inside removal) sat on the temporary grate and decided to light up a cigarette. The collector exploded and then burned down. He was blown out the access door with the explosion and the sprinkler heads went on after the fire started and water poured over him as he was lying on the ground.

Since we were told that the fires started when the process flow continued we need to look at the source of ignition. If the ignition is caused by sparks, the best way to suppress sparks is by going from laminar to turbulent flow in the dust before reaching the collector, with a good in-line spark arrestor. The next source of ignition might be through the cleaning jet. The cleaning jet can supply oxygen from the compressed air and when it reaches the cake maybe sufficient to cause some sparks similar to small explosions to occur in the cake. This may ignite the rest of the fine fume fuel to start a fire. This would be very pronounced, if the collector was running at a high pressure drop with a dense thick cake and frequent pulsing.

We can attack the symptoms or the causes. One way to attack the symptoms is to limit the thickness of the cake. This can be accomplished by installing PTFE membrane laminated bags. Another way to attack the symptoms is to clean the collector with compressed nitrogen instead of compressed air.

One cause may be because of the atrocious design of the cleaning system. The way to remedy the poor design is to modify the cleaning system design. To implement the change we need to throw away the venturies and modify the pulse pipes so they can run without venturies. We can get the pulse pipes modified so they will induce more cleaning air per unit of compressed air, possibly lowering the formation of sparks on the bag surface. It would allow the collector to run at a lower pressure drop with less frequent pulsing.

I always like to look at how the operation of the collector interacts in the process of venting the furnace. 

Read More...  About assistance with dust collection applications.

Booster - Duct Cleaner

It is very common to come across airflow problems, in industrial ducting systems;

• Dust drop-out in the ductwork, causing high maintenance
• Blockages in pneumatic conveying systems
• Low air conveying speeds in ducting systems
• Fire and explosion hazards caused by debris igniting in the duct
• Dust accumulations in spark arrestors and other devices in the air stream

A very simple solution exists for remedying these common problems. It is called an Auto-Booster / Duct Cleaner.

   

The duct booster is a pneumatically propelled jet generating system using the same jet pump design and components as are found in advanced technology pulse jet dust collectors. It is like having a booster fan in the duct system, with no moving parts. It will increase air speed in ducts by 3000-5000 feet per minute for short bursts of time. This will pick up the dust lying on the bottom of the duct and push it along to the dust collector. The air jets also remove electrostatic charges on the duct surfaces which are a source of ignition. When averaged over a day’s operation the cleaner need not be actuated except once in every one to four hours, and therefore air consumption is negligible. The Booster is usually powered by shop air at 85 PSI. Optional supersonic nozzles can be added to the blow pipes for more efficient pressure-to-velocity conversion.

It can also be designed for various low air pressures from 7-20 PSI, thereby allowing operation where shop air is not readily available.

The duct cleaner can be actuated by a manual push button or using the output from one of the positions on a pulse sequencer controlling the cleaning cycle of a dust collector.

Read more about... the BOOSTER - Duct Cleaner

Wood Fired Boilers

There are many conditions that lead to fires in wood fired boilers. The engineering solution requires recognizing the factors that contribute or cause these problems. Most are related to the combustion process and that the wood composition varies widely:

1. The emissions from the boiler consist of dust and gases that are not completely burned. These can be ignited by sparks coming from the boiler. The loading of these pollutants can vary widely. Gases may continue burning with a flame, and, sparks may be in the process gas stream. 
2. If we install a spark arrestor, such as a QUENCHER, before the dust collector, it will cause the gas pollutants to burn producing heat, carbon dioxide and some small fraction of water vapor. The QUENCHER will also prevent any sparks from entering the dust collector as the hot ciders will be immediately cooled to the gas temperature, as the air goes from laminar flow to turbulent flow and back to laminar flow. We now have cooled dust and ash entering the dust collector. The pulsing action of the cleaning system will fan any red-hot cinders if they are present. For reasons beyond the scope of this report, the dust cake will be dense and subject to ignition. Fortunately, conditions must be in a narrow LEL/UEL range to start a fire. With conventional pulse cleaning systems only a fraction of the filter cake on the bags is functional and the rest of the bags are plugged. 
3. We would modify the cleaning system with modifications that would enable the full surface of the filter media to be active. This would mean that the inventory of flammable dust would be reduced by over 95% so there would be no combustible dust between cleaning pulses. Surprisingly, the cleaning frequency would also be reduced. To accomplish this, we would need information regarding the design of the existing dust collector.

When completed this would be the best design, and, barring unforeseen circumstances such as power failures at inopportune times, the system should perform flawlessly for years. The only risk is that the filter bags could be attacked chemically. 

More information on... retrofitting existing dust collectors 

MINI-QUENCHER Spark Arrestor for Small Vacuum lines

QAM is pleased to announce the MINI-QUENCHER spark arrestor for use in 1", 2", 3" and 4" dust collection vacuum lines. This is the latest extension of of our incredible QUENCHER in-line spark arrester line.

The Q-1, Q-2, Q-3 and Q-4 spark arrestors answer a demand for spark protection in these smaller applications. Until now nothing has been available on the market for vacuum dust collection applications.

The MINI-QUENCHER:

• needed for welding, grinding, cutting operations
• extinguishes and cools sparks and embers that set fire to dust collectors and duct work
• in-line device, that is easily inserted in the duct work or vacuum tubing
• no maintenance, no additional drop out collection point required
• no moving parts, static device, no power required

More on... The Mini-Quencher

Explosion Vents

This is a touchy topic and greatly misunderstood. Today, plant operators recognize that there is more danger from lawyers, on this issue, than from actual explosions in the dust collector. In fact, the accumulation of dust in the plant itself is a greater danger for conflagration than a properly engineered dust collection system. Go to our website and view the videos on “Combustible dust in the workplace” by 60 Minutes on CBS and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

Go to view .... Combustible dust videos

Explosions in Dust Collectors

Explosions in pulse jet collectors invariably are when cleaning off-line and can be prevented by sound practice. We run into a risky process when we write the safe procedure because it is application dependent and relies on common sense of the operators. If your design is good engineering, there will be no explosion. All explosions in pulse jet dust collectors, we have investigated (about 100 or so), have been clear cut stupidity. Among the typical ones; horseplay, ignoring warnings posted on equipment and disgruntled employee sabotage.

The most risky application is a mechanical cleaning (shaker style) dust collector when cleaned off-line, and, you can only clean them off-line. A dangerous spark is generated by static charges produced during the shaker action. If I were there, I would tell someone else to turn off the collector or put a long delay on the shaker actuator while I go to the restroom. There is no particular reason to warrant us to observe an explosion first hand. I am cowardly since I heal from injuries slowly.

Advanced Technology vs Poorly Designed Dust Collectors

An overwhelming number of explosions have occurred on badly designed collectors with bottom inlets in which the fine dust has difficulty in making its way to the hopper until the fan is shut down. Advanced technology dust collectors (such as ULTRA-FLOW), with their high side inlet and high ratio cleaning system, have some marked advantages that further reduce the risks involved in explosions. One major advantage is the extremely high efficiency of these designs which prevents dust being returned to the plant, thereby reducing the hazard of accumulated dust referred to the introductory paragraph of this bulletin. The cleaning system more thoroughly cleans the bags and the inventory of dust on the bags is very low, and usually not sufficient to cause the dust concentration to go above the lower explosive limit in the event of an explosion front traveling into the collector from the inlet ducts. With these collectors, the fire and explosion generally occurs outside the collector, in the ductwork, and is drawn into the collector. In normal operation there is only a very small part of the collector that passes through the lower explosive limit. This consists of a narrow band about 1/8 to 1/4 inches thick that surrounds the bag when it is cleaned. Eggshell or singed finishes on the filter bag is recommended to further reduce dust inventory on the bags.

Placing the explosion vent below the filters (i.e. in the hopper) is a bad idea. It allows the pressure to build up in the housing before it can be released by an undersized vent in the hopper. This is especially true with conventional dust collector designs that have venturis restricting the neck of the filter cage at the tube-sheet. With advanced technology designs (having no venturi), we have 12-15 times more open area to the outlet which in itself is a natural explosion vent. We place the vent in the housing side where it offers the most protection by venting the explosion immediately where it occurs.

Woodworking

Because of the NFPA rules do not directly apply to dust collectors, there is much latitude in their interpretation. The solution is to apply sound engineering to assess the risk and to provide equipment suitable for a particular service. Venting woodworking applications is probably the largest number of installations in the dust collector industry. Explosions have occurred and the venting has been quite effective in controlling them.

The norm in the industry, for the last 30 or so years, has been to provide a 60:1 vent ratio. This has been sufficient for this service. ULTRA-FLOW uses a standard 20:1 vent ratio for its explosion vents, which further protects against the harmful effects of an explosion.

Vent Ratio

This was developed by UL labs. It is the ratio of the volume of the dirty air compartment of a dust collector to the area of the explosion vent. For example; a cylindrical bag dust collector with (24) 6 inch by 6 foot bags, dirty air housing size of 6ft x 4ft x 6ft, hopper which is 1/3 x ( 6 x 4 x6 ). The gross volume of the collector = 192 cu.ft. The volume of the bags is 24 x 1.2 cu.ft./ bag = 28.2. The volume of the collector = 192 – 28.2 = 164 cu.ft. Therefore, if we want a vent ratio of 20:1; 164/20 = 8 sq.ft. of explosion vent.

Ultra-Flow dust collectors use a vent ratio of 20:1. In general the insurance companies determine the specification that they want and we supply it accordingly. In the end, good engineering is the key.

Kst Ratings

This issue is very complex and not as easy as just meeting a “Kst” deflagration rating. It is an NFPA 68 test requirement for ideal lab conditions. “Kst” refers to the rate of pressure rise in an explosion. Unfortunately defining of the number is difficult since NFPA never really measure it except when they use a sealed globe enclosure, stir the dust in it and then try to ignite it with a sparkplug. This is not the real world of dust collectors.

A more accurate test was performed by AAF specifically on dust collectors. See the “Combustible Dusts” chart at the end of this bulletin. That chart shows the “Explosion Pressure” or burst pressure where theoretically a dust collector will blow apart in an explosion. If a dust collector is built of 12 gage steel to withstand +/- 20 SP (inWG). The burst pressure is usually a factor of 4 times that or 80 psi. As an example, for wood dust it was determined that a vent ratio of only 180:1 was safe in a dust collector. The chart says the burst pressure would be 35psi which is less than the 80psi allowed. Ultra-Flow uses a 20:1 vent ratio, therefore it is 9 times that value, so, you are as safe as you can get. No matter what you do, there will always be some risk. All we can do is make it inconsequential. As mentioned above, there is a far greater risk from dust in the plant than you will find in the dust collector itself. Look on the home page of our website for the news reports on “Combustible Dusts in the workplace”.

Read more ... Explosion Venting

Static Electricity and Dust Collector Systems

General Considerations
The effects of static electricity on the collection of dry particulate in fabric collectors is rather simple but misunderstood. For the most part, cartridge dust collectors experience the same issues.
First we must consider the cause of static charge build up in a collector. It occurs because the dust being collected is akin to a capacitor in an electronic circuit. In this day of computer chips the designer may not be familiar with this phenomenon. The capacity has two conductive plates separated by a layer of insulating material that has high enough insulation values that the static charge remains for relatively long periods. The charge can be removed by grounding one side of the capacitor. The charges then drain.
In dust collectors where the dust forms in the filter cake, the static charges may enter the collector on the surface of dry particulate dust. If the dust has high dielectric resistance properties, it can accumulate and build up in the filter cake. It can be viewed as many particles each carrying a static charge and acting like a miniature capacitor. The static charge will then build up on the surfaces and may reach a high enough level where a spark can be produced. This spark can trigger the explosion of explosive dusts.

Mechanical Cleaning (Shaker) Dust Collectors
In a fabric collector with a mechanical shaking mechanism to remove the dust, the collector is most vulnerable during the cleaning process. The dust is shaken from the filter bags in the process of shaking the cake, sparks sometimes are produced. Invariably, the dust/ gas mixture passes between the upper and lower explosive limits. A serious explosion may occur.
Usually these collectors will have explosion vents which relieve the high pressures that are generated in an explosion, presumably keeping the housing from being damaged and protecting the operating personnel near the dust collector.
In an attempt to keep this static charge from building to threatening levels, measures are included in an attempt to bleed this charge to ground. These include one or more of the following:
1) Sewing in grounding wires into the filter media.
2) Impregnating carbon or other conductive coating into the filter cloth.
These often give the designer a false sense of security in applying these to dust collectors. As explained above the dust, itself, insulates the charge and it remains in the cake until it reaches a point where a spark is generated. If the dust concentration is above the lower explosive limit and below the upper explosive limit, an explosion can occur. Fortunately, generation of the spark may not occur if the timing of the spark and dust concentration level do not coincide. An explosion does not occur in these cases.

Continuous Cleaning Reverse Jet Pulsed Dust Collectors
When dust, with the same properties described above, is vented in the same operations, using a reverse pulse jet cleaning system, the danger is considerably diminished unless the pulsing is applied in “off line” cleaning mode where the fan is stopped.
These collectors clean the bags by injecting air from the clean air plenum backwards through individual bags as the flow continues through the collector. This cleaning agitates the filter cake so the static charges are dissipated.
The danger of explosion occurs when the dust concentration coming into the collector reaches a level between the lower and upper explosive limit concentrations. This is highly unlikely but we recommend that properly sized explosion vents are installed which normally coincides with the requirements of insurance underwriting firms.
The explosions can occur when there is dust build up in ducts especially when long horizontal runs are encountered. The spark can be generated in ducts and the explosion front can travel down the duct into the dust collector, igniting a secondary explosion as the concentration in the collector housing is driven above the lower explosive limit for that dust. Even with no build up in the ductwork, an upset can occur in the process which generates sufficient dust concentrations.
One method of nullifying the possibilities of danger due to duct build up is to install an automatic booster / duct cleaner device. This booster can serve to automatically clean out any drop out in long horizontal duct runs.
Another phenomenon can affect of dust collector systems, is where the dust has high dielectric properties and the dust, because of static charges, will build up on the outside bend of an elbow. This dust can trigger an explosion if this dust is also flammable and explosive. Some examples of dust where this problem is often a factor are toners for copy machines and electrolyte powder used in alkaline batteries. The solution is to insert a pulsed air jet that agitates the built up dust that dissipates the charge. Some dry powder coating compounds are also subject to static charge build up in powder coating systems.

Read more about ... Booster / Duct Cleaner, and Quencher spark arrestor