Fires in brass furnaces have always been a danger.
First let us review the process; as the material is fed into the furnace
it has many metals including zinc, tin etc. Some of these actually go to vapor
and then condense and turn into solids.
The key is that these metals are very fine with very large area to
weight ratios. The exhaust is generally cooled by mixing with ambient air so
the metals are not appreciably oxidized. The dusts collect, with the other
dusts, in the dust filter cake.
When the collector is shut down the metals start to oxidize and the
effect is like catalytic combustion. The oxidation produces heat. The dust is
usually a good heat insulator and "hot spots" occur. Sometimes the
temperature is high enough to start a fire when the flow was stopped. More
often, when the collector is turned on, the initial flow fans the sparks and
when conditions are optimum for combustion, a fire will start. Most of the time
small holes or scorching can be noticed on the bags before a fire.
The approach to
prevent fires is to extinguish sparks if they are present and to cool the hot
spots when air is not flowing through the system.
To extinguish sparks the flow before the collector must be changed from
laminar to turbulent flow. This is accomplished by installing a QUENCHER spark
arrestor in the air conduit to the dust collector.
To keep the "hot spots" cool, my suggestion is to pulse the
collector off line every thirty minutes or so for one complete cycle to cool
the "hot spots". If the off-line cleaning is too frequent, the cake
will be destroyed or damaged, so, the cleaning must be controlled.
When selecting a fabric pulse jet collector, high-ratio technology
designs can operate at filter ratios of 16:1.
Cartridge collectors are not a good selection as the pleats may promote
formation of the hotspots described above.
We first used this technique at St Joe Mineral, which was near
Pittsburgh, 30 years ago, on their zinc oxide furnaces. We were informed that they were venting through an AAF
pulse jet collectors. AAF has managed to put
out some of the worst pulse jet collector designs in the Industry. From the
description it sounds like a AAF FabriPulse. That collector if it is top access
design has these venturies that wedge in the top of the bag. Using the American
vernacular, it sucks. The purpose of the venturi is to seal the top of the bag
with the cleaning jet. There are openings around the top of the bag below the
wide part of the venturi. This, in effect, allows the jet to grow until the
growth is stopped by the walls of the bag. That is an over simplification of
the process, but it is a fact that it sucks. The
net result is that the collector cleans poorly and there is a lot of dust that
is forced into the surface and subsurface filter cake.
On any kind of brass furnace it is best to keep the dust cake porous and
thin. As I explained previously, in a brass and other process, the zinc goes
from vapor to liquid to solid and forms zinc fume. This zinc fume because of
its large surface area to weight ratio can burn or explode quite easily.
We were involved in a legal action where the customer hired a man to
change bags on a MikroPul collector venting a zinc dipping operation where they
were coating pipes. The young man, after he was half finished (inside removal)
sat on the temporary grate and decided to light up a cigarette. The collector
exploded and then burned down. He was blown out the access door with the
explosion and the sprinkler heads went on after the fire started and water
poured over him as he was lying on the ground.
Since we were told that the fires started when the process flow
continued we need to look at the source of ignition. If the ignition is caused
by sparks, the best way to suppress sparks is by going from laminar to
turbulent flow in the dust before reaching the collector, with a good in-line
spark arrestor. The next source of ignition might be through the cleaning jet.
The cleaning jet can supply oxygen from the compressed air and when it reaches
the cake maybe sufficient to cause some sparks similar to small explosions to
occur in the cake. This may ignite the rest of the fine fume fuel to start a
fire. This
would be very pronounced, if the collector was running at a high pressure drop
with a dense thick cake and frequent pulsing.
We can attack the symptoms or the causes. One way to attack the
symptoms is to limit the thickness of the cake. This can be accomplished by
installing PTFE membrane laminated bags. Another
way to attack the symptoms is to clean the collector with compressed nitrogen
instead of compressed air.
One cause may be because of the atrocious design of the cleaning system.
The way to remedy the poor design is to modify the cleaning system design. To
implement the change we need to throw away the venturies and modify the pulse
pipes so they can run without venturies. We can get the pulse pipes modified so
they will induce more cleaning air per unit of compressed air, possibly
lowering the formation of sparks on the bag surface. It would allow the
collector to run at a lower pressure drop with less frequent pulsing.
I always like to look at how
the operation of the collector interacts in the process of venting the furnace.
Read More... About assistance with dust collection applications.
Read More... About assistance with dust collection applications.
No comments:
Post a Comment